Sharia Is Incompatible with Human Rights, Complaint at U.N. Alleges

The following report by Clare Lopez was published earlier this month by Sharia TipSheet.

Women Under Sharia

Sharia Is Incompatible with Human Rights, Complaint at U.N. Alleges

by Clare M. Lopez

UN Called to Respond to Sharia Violence against Women” by Raymond Ibrahim at Gatestone Institute, March 25, 2024

  • On March 8, 2024 — International Women’s Day — a formal complaint addressing how Islamic Law (sharia) is inherently abusive of women was submitted to the United Nations. Attached were the signatures of dozens of men and women worldwide, including victims of sharia, human rights activists, and more.
  • [Editor’s Note — See the Executive Summary of the complaint. It documents sharia-linked violence against women, pegs its source as the Quran and Hadith, and details other aspects of Islamic culture which are demeaning to women (e.g., female genital mutilation). The summary states flat out sharia is incompatible with human rights.]

Impregnating Infidels: Another Form of Jihad”, posted by Raymond Ibrahim at the Virginia Christian Alliance, March 27, 2024

  • “Love Jihad” continues

This month, we have a series of articles documenting the ongoing, increasing atrocities being committed by the Taliban against Afghan women — including flogging and stoning. Flogging and stoning to death are Islamic Hudud punishments for a specific set of offenses enumerated in the Qur’an. This means that doctrinally speaking, Taliban human rights abuses are neither extremist nor radical, but horrific as they are, instead mainstream, orthodox obedience to the doctrine, laws, and scripture of Islam.

Don’t Betray the Women of Afghanistan” by Lisa Curtis and Hadeia Amiry at Foreign Affairs Magazine, March 28, 2024

“Taliban leader says women will be stoned to death in public” by Akhtar Makoli at The Telegraph, March 25, 2024

“Afghanistan: Taliban’s Supreme Leader says ‘We will flog women in public, we will stone them to death in public’” by Robert Spencer at Jihad Watch, March 27, 2024

Taliban vow to Start Stoning Women to Death in Public for Adultery in Afghanistan” at Logan’s Warning, March 26, 2024

Continuing Follow-Up to HAMAS Sexual Atrocities Against Israeli Women on October 7, 2023

“Israeli woman who was held hostage by Hamas speaks out on her abduction and sexual assault in Gaza” by Lauren Izso at CNN, March 27, 2024

Attackers laughed as they raped and murdered a woman in Israel on October 7, witness says” by Jake Tapper, Kirsten Appleton and Rachel Clarke, at CNN, April 10, 2024

“Freed hostage says Palestinian civilians abducted and sold her to Hamas” at World Israel News, April 9, 2024

  • Understand that according to the Qur’an as well as examples in the Sira from the life of Muhammad, it is not only lawful for Muslims to take female “prisoners of war” and keep them or sell them, but also to rape them at will (Q 33:50)

More from around the world

UK honor-based crimes up 62% in 2 years” by David Isaac at the Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), April 9, 2024

  • [Editor’s Note — One of the most spectacular Islamic honor killings in the U.K. occurred in 2006. Banaz Mahmod was killed, stuffed in a suitcase, and buried in the back yard by her father, uncle, and three cousins. Banaz is the subject of a chilling short story, ‘Spooked’ (print version and radio theater production available).]

“A ‘Refugee’ Restores His Family’s Honor” by Robert Spencer at Front Page Magazine, April 8, 2024

  • Mohamedamin A. Ibrahim was “charged with murder for allegedly killing his seven-months-pregnant Swedish girlfriend rather than face the shame of introducing her to his strict Muslim family.”
  • More here — “Somali refugee allegedly strangles pregnant Swedish girlfriend in honor killing” by Yaron Steinbuch at New York Post, April 4, 2024

“French 13-year-old girl ‘savagely attacked by teen gang for being a disbeliever’” by Carl Deconinck at Brussels Signal, 4 April 2024

Kidnapper Wins Custody of 13-Year-Old Girl, Sources Say” at the Morning Star News, March 27, 2024

  • This one’s heartbreaking. A Pakistani court rejected a Christian mother’s attempt to recover her daughter after she was abducted, forcibly converted to Islam, and forced to marry her 28-year-old Muslim kidnapper.

For previous essays by Clare Lopez at Sharia TipSheet, see the Clare Lopez Archives.

7 thoughts on “Sharia Is Incompatible with Human Rights, Complaint at U.N. Alleges

  1. The UN complaint about Sharia and human rights is pointless. The Islamic definition of “human rights” is different than the Western definition. Islam does not acccept the Western definition.

  2. @ billrla

    Re: “The UN complaint about Sharia and human rights is pointless. The Islamic definition of “human rights” is different than the Western definition. Islam does not acccept the Western definition.”

    Yes, that is quite correct.Back in the early 2000s, in the wake of the 9-11-01 attacks, the western powers via the UN approached the OIC (Organization of Islamic Conference/Organization of Islamic Cooperation), which is the “UN of the Islamic world,”in a manner of speaking, and asked them to affirm a declaration condemning Islamic terrorism.

    The OIC read the report of the UN and in due course replied that they would not affirm it, since a number of its provisions violated sharia law. The conference also refused to call as terrorism any act permitted by sharia.

    This is all geopolitical theater anyway. The UN claims it is worried about the rights of women in Afghanistan, but what about the multitudes of women in the West now being victimized by Muslim attackers of various kinds?

    The so-called “Free World” should have pulled the plug on the UN years ago, it has become so corrupt and useless.

  3. It bears mentioning that relying on the UN to secure one’s human rights is – for all intents and purposes – a fool’s errand. The UN is selective about whose rights it supports, for one, and for another, the United Nations today has become a corrupt racket which bears little resemblance to the organization founding during/after the Second World War.

    Indeed, in the first place, the UN High Commissioner on Refugees (and the bureaucracy attached to the office) are neck-deep in the demographic assault upon the West.

    The pipeline varies by country somewhat, but to use the U.S. as an example, the “refugee resettlement racket” begins with the High Commissioner on Refugees, from which it then leads to the U.S. federal government, specifically the Dept. of State, and then to the various non-governmental organizations/charities which serve as the public face of this enormous effort, i.e., the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society (HIAS), Catholic Charities, and the World Council of Churches, to name three.

    In return for a cash payout for each individual “placed” in a new location, these charities then locate individuals and small groups at their final destinations.

    This knowledge, much of it at any rate, is known as a result of the intrepid Texas mother/housewife-turned-detective Ann Corcoran, who is also proprietor of the website “Refugee Resettlement Watch.”

    Corcoran was just minding her own business when Somalians and other dark-skinned “refugees” from the Islamic world and elsewhere began to appear in her rural area, where none lived previously, no one spoke their language, and there was not even a mosque. At the time, there were insufficient jobs for long-time residents of the area, so why place people there?

    And that is how Corcoran and others began uncovering the “Great Replacement,” the demographic assault upon the West being carried out by the ruling elites, who for all-intents-and-purposes have declared war upon their own peoples and civilization.

    If the UN is so concerned about the rights of women, then why is it aiding-and-abetting the de facto subjugation of them via the importation of millions of Muslims into the non-Muslim world?

  4. The West/UN cares nothing for women. They are useful pawns for our self destruction with abortion rights and “we are Hamas” nonsense.

  5. It may be of interest to note that at the end of one of the Hamas rape videos of the hostages, there is a woman dressed in a garment consistent with sharia rules for the clothing of slaves. As far as I can recall, this entails the coverage of the body only between the navel and the knee. In this case mid thigh might have been what was available in the shops.

    The positioning of the captor’s hand and the slight reaction by the hostage seems to imply that there is some sympathy on behalf of the captor. Perhaps that is reading too much into limited evidence. It is all extremely distressing nevertheless.

    Instruction: Copy to address bar and eliminate the space.

    IMPORTANT! WARNING: Explicit images. Don’t access if you are of a sensitive nature. These images can be considered offensive.

    https://postimg.cc/mz QjvSgM
    https://postimg.cc/vg zq1zwy
    https://postimg.cc/CZ CJtN18
    https://postimg.cc/Ff JXJwT4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.