Finance and economics | Buttonwood

The dividend is back. Are investors right to be pleased?

Why cash payments are no longer the preserve of widows and orphans

Illustration of a man receiving a wad of money out of a cashpoint machine
Illustration: Satoshi Kambayashi

Meta celebrated its 20th anniversary this week as all good and mature businesses should: by paying shareholders a dividend. In lieu of a birthday bash, the Silicon Valley stalwart marked its coming of age with a stock buy-back and, for the first time, by offering a dividend. Investors will receive 50 cents per share. Markets partied, with Meta’s share price rising by 20%, adding more than $200bn to the company’s market capitalisation on the day of the announcement.

The dividend, a 17th-century innovation, was a mainstay of markets for much of the 20th century. Stockpickers used the cash they earned from dividends to price shares. The Bloomberg terminal of its time, Moody’s Analyses of Investments, evaluated the giants of American rail on dividends per mile of railroad laid. But the years have not been kind to the once-dominant dividend. Since the early 1990s, regular cash payments to shareholders have been in retreat, losing out to stock buy-backs, in which management uses earnings to repurchase their stock, boosting the share price.

This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "The dividend is back"

Who is in control? Xi v the markets

From the February 10th 2024 edition

Discover stories from this section and more in the list of contents

Explore the edition

More from Finance and economics

How Ukrainians are using the cover of war to escape taxes

“Black grain” infuriates exporters playing by the rules

What campus protesters get wrong about divestment

Will withdrawing money hurt Israel?


Hedge funds make billions as India’s options market goes ballistic

The country’s retail investors are doing less well