Publisher flags papers found by university to involve misconduct more than a year ago

Toxicologic Pathology – a Sage title – has issued expressions of concern for six papers that were among the subjects of an investigation by Azabu University that concluded in November 2022.

The expression of concern, dated March 7, 2024, includes a list of the six articles and reads:

Toxicologic Pathology was contacted by the author, Shin Wakui, requesting retraction of these articles. Despite multiple attempts at gaining further information on the reasons for retraction, we have not received anymore communication regarding this case.

This expression of concern will remain in place until further evidence is provided to Sage.

The university issued a report about the misconduct findings in November 2022, which Lemonstoism, author of World Fluctuation Watch, sent us at the time and which we forwarded to Sage once we saw the expressions of concern. The university investigated 31 papers, of which at least two have been retracted.

The authors did not share that report when they contacted the journal in November 2023, a Sage spokesperson told Retraction Watch. “At this point it’s too soon to say how the report might impact any future action with the article,” Sage told us.

Wakui’s Azabu email address bounced, and we were unable to find other contact information for him.

Here are the six papers:

Collectively, the papers have been cited just shy of 100 times, with just a handful of those citations coming after the university report was published in 2022.

Like Retraction Watch? You can make a tax-deductible contribution to support our work, subscribe to our free daily digest or paid weekly updatefollow us on Twitter, like us on Facebook, or add us to your RSS reader. If you find a retraction that’s not in The Retraction Watch Database, you can let us know here. For comments or feedback, email us at [email protected].

One thought on “Publisher flags papers found by university to involve misconduct more than a year ago”

  1. Institutions should be reporting this information to the journals that are affected. Don’t trust the authors to do it! Journals are being asked to manage research integrity with their hands tied behind their back – institutions need to step up !

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.