Payne v. Washington et al
Plaintiff: Kraig Payne
Defendant: . Washington, . Leflare and . Allen
Case Number: 1:2024cv01174
Filed: May 2, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Central District of Illinois
Presiding Judge: James E Shadid
Nature of Suit: Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 2, 2024 Filing 2 PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, filed by Kraig Payne.(KE)
May 2, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Kraig Payne. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(KE)
May 2, 2024 Case transferred to the ND/IL. Case was electronically submitted to the transferee court. (KE)
May 2, 2024 Opinion or Order TEXT ORDER entered by Judge James E. Shadid on 5/2/2024. Plaintiff filed a Complaint #1 under 42 U.S.C. Sec 1983 alleging violations of his constitutional rights when he was incarcerated at Stateville Correctional Center ("Stateville"). Venue for federal civil rights actions is governed by 28 U.S.C. Sec 1391(b). According to that statute, such actions may be brought only in (1) the judicial district where any defendant resides (if all defendants reside in the same State), (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or (3) a judicial district in which any defendant may be found, if there is no district in which the action may otherwise be brought. It appears that a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims in this lawsuit occurred when Plaintiff was incarcerated at Stateville located in Will County, Illinois, which is situated in the federal judicial district of the Northern District of Illinois Eastern Division. See 28 U.S.C. Sec 93(a)(1). Plaintiff also names Stateville correctional and medical staff as Defendants. The Court therefore finds that venue over this proceeding is in the Northern District and that it is in the interest of justice for this cause to be transferred there. See 28 U.S.C. Sec 1404(a). No summons shall issue in this action unless directed by the transferee court. The Clerk is directed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. (KE)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Illinois Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Payne v. Washington et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Kraig Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: . Washington
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: . Leflare
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: . Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?