Nijland v. Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, CA
William C Nijland |
Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, CA |
3:2024cv00793 |
April 30, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Maria E Garcia |
Banks and Banking |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 NOTICE REGARDING SERVICE: The self-represented plaintiff shall proceed with service upon the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and may refer to pages 8-11 of the Court's Guide for Self-Represented Parties found on our website here: https://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/rules-and-forms. If service is not effected by 7/29/2024, the case will be subject to dismissal. Dismissal due by 7/29/2024. Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Electronic Filing Order, #2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel filed by William C Nijland, #7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #6 Standing Protective Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by William C Nijland. Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 6 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/30/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/30/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 6/29/2024 Discovery due by 10/30/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 12/4/2024 Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 4/30/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by William C Nijland. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, CA, filed by William C Nijland. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing fee received from William C Nijland: $ 405.00, receipt number BPT-374037. (Fanelle, N.) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nijland v. Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, CA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: William C Nijland | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Department of Financial Protection & Innovation, CA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.