Schwarck v. Redditt et al
| Anthony Schwarck |
| John Redditt and JBRC, Inc |
| 6:2024cv02021 |
| April 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Iowa |
| Mark A Roberts |
| CJ Williams |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Notice of Removal - Fraud |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 DOCKET Annotation: Please find Civil Removal Actions new case packet attached (des) |
| Filing 3 JURY DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Anthony Schwarck (des) |
| Filing 2 STATE Court Petition by Anthony Schwarck (des) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of Removal by JBRC, Inc, John Redditt from Mitchell County District Court, case number LACV015996. Defendant was served with state court petition/documents on 04/09/2024 ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AIANDC-4153140), filed by JBRC, Inc, John Redditt. Scheduling Report due by 6/28/2024 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B (Local Rule 81(a) Statement, #3 Civil Cover Sheet) (Carls, Abram) |
| Set Deadlines: Defendant LR 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement due by 5/20/2024. Defendant FRCP 7.1(a)(2) Citizenship Disclosure Statement due by 5/20/2024. Plaintiff FRCP 7.1(a)(2) Citizenship Disclosure Statement due by 6/29/2024. (des) |
| Chief Judge CJ Williams and Magistrate Judge Mark A Roberts added. No conflicts identified. (des) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Iowa Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
